------- Comment #3 from sakovacs at freemail dot hu 2006-04-08 02:53 -------
Thanks for the very fast reply. I agree, that such a leakage would be very
unlikely. It must be something else, but I don't understand what, I've modified
the code:
#include <string>
#include <vector>
int max = 1000000;
void bad() {
std::vector<std::string> v;
for (int x = 0; x < max; x++) v.push_back(std::string("test"));
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
bad();
usleep(20000 * 1000);
return 0;
}
I've already tested with valgrind, restested this ^ version too, just like
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27079
