------- Comment #8 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-04-03 16:52 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> I believe c-common.c:pointer_int_sum is wrong in relying on pointer overflow
> during conversion of the integer offset to an unsigned pointer.  I'm sending
> a patch that fixes this for comments.

The patch seems a bit too conservative to me; perhaps just always comparing the
offsets as signed could work?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26763

Reply via email to