------- Comment #21 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-31 14:29 -------
(In reply to comment #20)
> It's the wrong PR, this one is for pre-4.2, the 3 workarounds work.
> The problem is minor for pre-4.2.  The blocker PR for 4.2 is PR other/26507.

Huh?  The third comment in 26507 (by you I might add) agrees that PR 26507 and
this one are the same problem.  We should close one as a dup of the other.

I also don't understand what you mean by pre-4.2.  Is that a roundabout way of
saying 4.1?  I don't have any problems in 4.1.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23541

Reply via email to