------- Comment #9 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-03-22 13:08 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > i = (i += 1); > > where for i += 1 the next sequence point is the i = ... assigment?
The next sequence point is the semicolon. > Of course for the particular testcase the ordering of the two stores > does not matter. Would int i=0; i = ++i + 1; be able to result in > i == 1? Yes, the side effects of = and ++ can be performed in either order. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18050
