------- Comment #13 from sabre at nondot dot org 2006-03-21 18:03 ------- Pardon the potentially silly question here, but why 'hidden'? Why not TREE_PUBLIC(decl) = 0? It seems that members of anonymous namespaces should be completely internal, and not depend on platform support for hidden visibility.
If I understand correctly, marking something hidden places more slightly more burden on the static linker than marking it internal, and not all platforms support hidden. Should I (re)open a new bug for to request TREE_PUBLIC(decl) = 0 behavior? -Chris -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21581
