------- Comment #11 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-03-08 22:36 ------- Hum, I see. Therefore c++/21682 is also invalid? And EDG too, apparently ;)
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26605
------- Comment #11 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-03-08 22:36 ------- Hum, I see. Therefore c++/21682 is also invalid? And EDG too, apparently ;)
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26605