------- Comment #12 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-03-08 18:45 ------- (In reply to comment #11) > I changed the PR component to a historically more probable one, to avoid > blaming libstdc++, as it seems that's an conclusion you're trying to avoid.
Agreed, *as a miscompilation*, can be a regression. And, yes, I'm trying to avoid that conclusion, because, really, the chances that something show up in the libstdc++ side, without some help from you, a reduced testcase of sort, are close to zero, given the evidence we have got to date. Again, in my opinion, in such cases, it would be better to have available in Bugzilla an "unclassified" component. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25815
