------- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-07 15:16 ------- Now I think the idea in comment #3 is incorrect. I looked at implementing it today, and I realized that it will also cause a super() constructor call to throw an exception.
The idea in comment #1 may still work. I'd prefer something more direct however. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22377
