------- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-06 06:23 ------- I have found the fix for this. It is simple. Do we want to allow the missing & and then give an error on -pedantic?
Intel allows the missing & and continues at the next non blank character. How strict shall we go? per standard it "shall have". -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19101
