------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-02 21:14 ------- The first one is ok C even though it is not OK C89 but it is fine C99. The second one is not ok C at all, since you are deferencing a void pointer.
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26533