------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-02 21:14 -------
The first one is ok C even though it is not OK C89 but it is fine C99.
The second one is not ok C at all, since you are deferencing a void pointer.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26533

Reply via email to