------- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2006-02-28 21:50 ------- Subject: Re: Wrong parsing of doubles when interpreted
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, schwab at suse dot de wrote: > > > ------- Comment #6 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-02-28 21:40 ------- > (In reply to comment #5) > > > The number 5e-324 exceeds the range of the (C language) double type. So > > > the > > > > It's (just) within the range of denormal values for IEEE double precision. > > 5e-324 is already out of range. The limit is about 4.941e–324. 4.941e-324 < 5e-324. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26483
