------- Comment #16 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-02-20 05:11 
-------
(In reply to comment #15)
> With my reduced testcase (well s/long long/long/), we get:
>   D.1552_8 = -a_7;
> a_7: [0, +INF]  EQUIVALENCES: { } (0 elements)
Shouldn't that just be marked as varying instead as a_7 is unsigned?

Likewise for the orginal testcase in this bug.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26361

Reply via email to