------- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-19 01:41 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > This points to a compatibility issue, but the fact that it did not fail on the > first read and did on the second is suspicious.
Not really as there was enough data for the first one but not enough for the second one. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26357
