------- Comment #22 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-16 02:07
-------
How would you guys design this?
Have configure do all the work?
What happens when someone wants to add a new language, do you have to update
configure?
Why should that happen, that is just extra work.
The behavior that is happening here is the same behavior that actually does
make sense as the language configuration is done in config-lang.in and nowhere
else (well Ada is special in that it has some code in the toplevel configure
but no other language is that special).
Lets look at what Ben did, he remove the library and ada language directories
without removing the Ada runtime programs directory which means it will always
build the runtime programs.
If I remove the gcc/cp directory, libstdc++ will always be built.
This is invalid as this is how the build system is done.
If you guys want it changed, write to the list instead of writting into this
bug as the build maintainers don't read the bug reports that much (or even
patches lately).
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26259
