------- Comment #4 from uttamp at us dot ibm dot com 2006-02-16 00:35 ------- Subject: Re: another memory leak
> > ------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-15 23:09 > ------- > Fixed. > > dist_v and init_v are GC pointers so they don't really need to be freed > manually. That's correct. I realized it after submitting the bug report. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26147
