------- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-15 21:47 ------- That patch looks wrong. There has to be a better way, maybe just rejecting return slot optimization instead.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26004
[Bug c/26004] [4.1/4.2 Regression] gcc errors on valid code [SVO]
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:47:41 -0800
- [Bug c/26004] [4.1/4.2 Regression] gcc err... amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug c/26004] [4.1/4.2 Regression] gc... pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug c/26004] [4.1/4.2 Regression] gc... pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug c/26004] [4.1/4.2 Regression] gc... mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug c/26004] [4.1/4.2 Regression] gc... pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug c/26004] [4.1/4.2 Regression] gc... pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug c/26004] [4.1/4.2 Regression] gc... pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug c/26004] [4.1/4.2 Regression] gc... janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug c/26004] [4.1/4.2 Regression] gc... jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug c/26004] [4.1/4.2 Regression] gc... jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
