------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-14 00:37 ------- I am going to test the following patch (but I would like to know if this is the correct approach): Index: config/rs6000/darwin.md =================================================================== --- config/rs6000/darwin.md (revision 110948) +++ config/rs6000/darwin.md (working copy) @@ -254,8 +254,8 @@ Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA. */
(define_insn "load_macho_picbase_si" [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "=l") - (unspec:SI [(match_operand:SI 1 "immediate_operand" "s")] - UNSPEC_LD_MPIC))] + (unspec:SI [(match_operand:SI 1 "immediate_operand" "s") + (pc)] UNSPEC_LD_MPIC))] "(DEFAULT_ABI == ABI_DARWIN) && flag_pic" "bcl 20,31,%1\\n%1:" [(set_attr "type" "branch") @@ -263,7 +263,8 @@ Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA. */ (define_insn "load_macho_picbase_di" [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand" "=l") - (unspec:DI [(match_operand:DI 1 "immediate_operand" "s")] UNSPEC_LD_MPIC))] + (unspec:DI [(match_operand:DI 1 "immediate_operand" "s") + (pc)] UNSPEC_LD_MPIC))] "(DEFAULT_ABI == ABI_DARWIN) && flag_pic && TARGET_64BIT" "bcl 20,31,%1\\n%1:" [(set_attr "type" "branch") -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26272
