------- Comment #10 from uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-08 22:36 ------- (In reply to comment #9) > The first 3 are so well-understood as to be fixed on my machine. :-) We are > working on the 4th.
Excellent! > > Will you be committing the patch, or is this not the proper fix? > > It's the fix. Sorry for the delay in applying it, we've been a bit busy > lately. No problem -- thanks a lot for providing the fix so quickly! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26096
