------- Comment #9 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2006-02-06 20:57 ------- Subject: Re: EQUIVALENCE broken in 32-bit code with optimization -O2
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 08:33:39PM -0000, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > ------- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-06 20:33 > ------- > Note that http://www.netlib.org/blas/d1mach.f has code > The version of blas that is bundled with lapack from netlib does not include this routine. A grep on lapack sources shows no nonconforming uses of equivalence. I certainly won't object to someone hacking gfortran to do what the programmer wants, but I think the effort could be spent on other parts of gfortran that actually broken with respect to the standard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24406
