------- Comment #7 from tony dot linthicum at amd dot com  2006-02-06 17:13 
-------
So do I, at least for the original code (i.e. test and test1).  I'm curious,
though, if you've tried the example that I listed above (foo).  I still get
subregs with that one, though I honestly don't recall at the moment whether or
not it makes the register allocator screw up or not (I *think* it does, but I'd
have to check).  Either way, though, the presence of the subregs provides the
needed fodder for RA badness so I'm curious if it's present in what you're
working on.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15792

Reply via email to