------- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-31 16:14 ------- Can you quantify "a bit worse" code? Also, did you bootstrap/test the patch?
Btw., now that it's properly analyzed I don't think this should be P1 - in fact the patch looks too invasive for 4.1.0, but it should probably go to trunk and considered for backporting to 4.1.1. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24996
