------- Comment #15 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-30 19:39 ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Sounds like the tree-optimizers should have replaced "0"[1] with '0'. This > also sounds like it was pure chance that the bug didn't trigger at -O0.
Yes they should have but that is a tottally different issue which was filed (I forgot the number). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26001
