------- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-30 18:38 ------- (In reply to comment #9) > The problem is the construct &&label1 - &&label2 used in the > source (b.t.w. is this usage of the GCC &&label extension > valid in the first place?
It is "correct" but not does could mean something different than what the programmer meant as labels are moved around by the scheduler and maybe for 4.2 by the tree level (if I get my way). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26018
