------- Comment #5 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-01-30 00:45 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > | AFAICS, the standard is silent about this issue. I think the suggested > | change is correct. > > I believe Martin Sebor filled a related PR, whereby we should have > converted n to *some* integral type before proceeding...
I was also under that impression. That issue, however, was about Size in algos, which, at least, is required to be convertible to an integral type. I don't think we even have such *minimal* requirement here... What do you suggest? Should the LWG discuss such kind of requirements for Distance too? In the meanwhile suspend? I have no strong opinions... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26020
