------- Comment #9 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-29 08:55 ------- > Yes of course these suggestions would work fine, but they would be in the > nature of workarounds. I was merely trying to illustrate that others also > seem > to believe that the absence of a definition (macro or function) and/or the > absence of the function itself should cause a compile-time error.
In a freestanding environment (see the entry for -ffreestanding in the manual) but certainly not in the default gnu89 mode. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26005
