------- Comment #4 from yuri at tsoft dot com  2006-01-27 00:44 -------
For templates it's sufficient to treat void as type in template
specializations.
No need to further change language.
Especially because generic programming doesn't really scale much beyond it's
'local' use like in STL.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25986

Reply via email to