------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-25 01:55 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > before you declare something as a regression, please make sure you do > understand the real issues. When you don't fully understand, please > leave it alone and help somewhere else. Thanks.
Well Marking things as regression is easy as it is just easy to test it on different versions of GCC which I did. Now figuring out what we should do here is not up to me which is why I did not confirm it. Now I read the DR and the standard (well I did read it for the bug linked here) but it seems like the DR only resolves one part of the question but it seems raise differnet questions for me which is why I left it unconfirmed. Should have I written this first, maybe but then again you would have harped on me anyways. If you noticed I gave some back ground info on when the change happened and CCed the person who changed it to get a clarification (in fact I said that in comment #2). I linked to the DR report so that people could easier access to it instead of remembering the link each time when comming to this bug. (and now this whole thing is offtopic from the bug report). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25950
