> OK? Assuming you add a proper "???" comment explaining why we use an alignment of 8 in this file (basically summarizing this PR), this is OK.
> 2006-01-16 John David Anglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > PR ada/24533 > * s-osinte-linux-hppa.ads: Reduce alignment of atomic_lock_t to 8. > > Index: s-osinte-linux-hppa.ads > =================================================================== > --- s-osinte-linux-hppa.ads (revision 109788) > +++ s-osinte-linux-hppa.ads (working copy) > @@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ > lock : lock_array; > end record; > pragma Convention (C, atomic_lock_t); > - for atomic_lock_t'Alignment use 16; > + for atomic_lock_t'Alignment use 8; > > type struct_pthread_fast_lock is record > spinlock : atomic_lock_t;
