------- Comment #17 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-09 18:56 ------- (In reply to comment #16) > The idea of comment #14 and #15 looks better than mine, yes.
I'll continue what I've started, then. > Which bug is the slowness bug btw? We should really be discussing solutions > for that bug in the audit trail of that bug instead of this one ;-) PR18937. I'll have it point to the discussion here. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18540
