------- Comment #9 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-01-08 09:49 ------- Subject: Re: named common block confused as procedure - runtime segfault
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: >------- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-08 06:13 >------- >(In reply to comment #7) > > >>In fact, it regtests OK, apart from the above. >> >> > >I want to say that PR 20881 is the same issue too. > > > > Thanks Andrew, I know that one of Joost's PRs were associated with this issue. I will sit down tonight with the standard and will work out who can or cannot reference whom; I came across entry_1.f90 i the testsuite that has a program name thet is the same as one of the procedures. I believe that it is kosher but I want to be really sure. Equally PR23308 and g77/19990905-1.f need to have their legality sorted out. Apart from that, the patch is ready. Maybe I should do argument type checking too? Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23308
