------- Comment #11 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2006-01-04 00:02 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE with const int copied into two different functions
rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz wrote: > what about this patch, then (assuming it passes testing)? Better -- but there's no reason to do it before the break statement; if we're not going to use init, then we don't neeed to unshare it. I think you can do it right *after* the break statement. > Index: cp/init.c > =================================================================== > *** cp/init.c (revision 109271) > --- cp/init.c (working copy) > *************** constant_value_1 (tree decl, bool integr > *** 1503,1508 **** > --- 1503,1510 ---- > mark_used (decl); > init = DECL_INITIAL (decl); > } > + init = unshare_expr (init); > + > if (!(init || init == error_mark_node) > || !TREE_TYPE (init) > || (integral_p > > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25632
