------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-30 21:53 -------
(In reply to comment #0)
> ...
> Running /TMP/test/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/cpp.exp ...
> XPASS: gcc.dg/cpp/cmdlne-dI-M.c scan-file
> (^|\\n)cmdlne-dI-M.*:[^\\n]*cmdlne-dI-M.c
> XPASS: gcc.dg/cpp/cmdlne-dM-M.c scan-file
> (^|\\n)cmdlne-dM-M[^\\n]*:[^\\n]*cmdlne-dM-M.c
Those usually mean a couple of things. And I doubt there is a way to remove
the xfail at all.
And I don't see them
> Running /TMP/test/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/trad/trad.exp ...
> ...
> Running /TMP/test/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/dg.exp ...
> XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0
That was PR 21655 which was fully fixed for 4.2.0, it is nothing to worry
about.
> Running /TMP/test/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/gcov/gcov.exp ...
> ...
> Running /TMP/test/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-dg/normal.exp ...
> XPASS: 26_numerics/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test for excess
> errors)
That xfail should say xfail because it depends on the glibc version.
I don't see this xpass anyways.
Anyways this is a won't fix so closing as such.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25606
