------- Comment #6 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-12-16 18:36 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Too funny, the Andrew-centric view of the world :-) :-) > Other people do the same too. I was just the first to complain. > > There still needs to be a way to build without a bootstrap and without > reconfiguring. If there is not then we will get bug reports about that. And > this is still a documention failure.
I agree about the documentation issue, maybe. Still, I don't think there is anything wrong with this change, I agree totally with Joseph, FWIW my opinion about such matters. I mean, normal users *must* boostrap anyway, GCC hackers have just to pass a very simple config option (and running configure is very fast, in general). Personally, I adapted to the new behavior in 2 minutes. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25455
