------- Comment #6 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-14 18:36 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Having GCC depend on a fix in > DejaGnu would not be popular unless there were other compelling reasons to > require people to upgrade. Thoughts?
If the breakage is in dejagnu, certainly a fix should go there. However I don't feel strongly about whether to fix it in GCC additionally and separately. If forced to pick, I'd lean towards dejagnu only since I'll upgrade once the new version is out. If we don't fix it in GCC, then we should remove the documentation that says it works. Perhaps we could recommend dg-xfail-if instead? Either way we should probably continue to remove the existing dg-do xfails since we'll start getting a bunch of spurious XPASSes once people start upgrading to the new dejagnu. I'll try and handle the ones that trigger on my platforms but some I can't test to know whether simply to remove the xfail or change it to dg-xfail-if. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25352
