------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-08 23:36 ------- Hmm, I actually want to say that case 2, 4, and 6 are actually valid (But I have not looked at the standard) as anonymous types are special.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |accepts-invalid
Known to fail| |2.95.3 3.0.4 3.2.3 3.4.0
| |3.3.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25322
