------- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 18:18 ------- [Thanks for the very detailed plan.]
> You can assign this to me, but I won't be able to get to this for the next > week, so maybe I better have it assigned to me when I actually have time to > work on this (in about a week, if it's not fixed by then). Either way is fine > with me. I think I can try to implement what you have sketched, but only for mainline, as I'll first need to familiarize myself further with Tree-SSA and the vectorizer, and this is low priority for the time being. I probably won't be able to do so in time for the 4.1 release. So it's up to you to decide what to do for the 4.1 branch. I personally think that punting would be just fine there, at least until we have a real fix. So I'd lean towards installing the workaround on the 4.1 branch only and leaving the PR open until you or I get a chance to really tackling the problem. What do you think? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24378
