------- Comment #2 from albertm at uphs dot upenn dot edu 2005-12-06 22:52 ------- Subject: Re: gfortran ignores explicit return type for fun ctions
Thank you very much. My apologies. I don't understand Fortran as well as I should. Sincerely, Mike Albert On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > ------- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-06 22:14 > ------- > (In reply to comment #0) > > > PROGRAM BUG > > external real function Mfunc > > This declares an external symbol called > "realfunctionmfunc" (fixed form), which is > probably not what you intended. > > If you replace that line by > > real Mfunc > external Mfunc > > things work. If you try to compile this in free form > (extension .f95), you get a syntax error. > > I'm resolving this as "invalid". Feel free to re-open it > if you believe that I haven't addressed the issue correctly. > > Thomas > > > -- > > tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ---- > CC| |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu > dot > | |org > Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED > Resolution| |INVALID > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25174 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25174
