------- Comment #11 from hhinnant at apple dot com 2005-12-02 21:21 ------- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > Not being someone with a lot of FE experience, I have more hesitation about > > this latter approach. > > That solution still does not solve my issue of the diagnostic issue.
Doesn't it? try/catch is no longer #defined, and client code will get a diagnostic if it uses try/catch with -fno-exceptions (only the system headers get special treatment by the FE). That's what we want, right? > > We really should not be defining keywords in the headers at all. If we define > bool somewhere to be int, we would get incorrect behavior the same way we are > getting for try/catch. > <nod> That's always been a golden rule that has worked well for me (after learning it the hard way many moons ago ;-) ). -Howard -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25191
