Consider: unsigned int bar (void);
void foo (void) { unsigned int a = bar (); if (a <= 3) bar (); } ./cc1 -quiet -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer generates foo: move.l %a2,-(%sp) lea bar,%a2 jbsr (%a2) moveq #3,%d1 cmp.l %d0,%d1 jbcs .L4 jbsr (%a2) .L4: move.l (%sp)+,%a2 rts Note that moveq #3,%d1 cmp.l %d0,%d1 jbcs .L4 can be replaced with lsr.l #2,%d0 jbne .L4 This bug depends on PR 25113 because GCC needs to know that lsr.l sets the zero flag correctly. -- Summary: [m68k] Inefficient inequality comparisons with small integers Product: gcc Version: 4.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC target triplet: m68k-elf BugsThisDependsOn: 25113 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25114