------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-27 01:00 -------
Hmm, 3.3.x did not define __float128 at all. 3.4 and 4.0 did not ICE at -O1
-mmmx but did at -O2 -mmmx (that means it is unit-at-a-time related). I am
going to mark this as a regression as anything to an ICE should be considered a
regression but I am not going to confirm it as I don't know which way this
should be, rejected or accepted.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|__float128 ICE on x86 |[3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression]
| |__float128 ICE on x86
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25042
