------- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-26 19:41
-------
Well, only g95 sees this bug. Is it really a violation of the standard? I don't
think so...
## g95 ##
In file foo.f90:1
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: C1=1
1
Error: COMMON block 'c1' at (1) is also a PARAMETER
## Intel ##
## Portland ##
## Sun ##
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|better diagnostic needed |same name for parameter and
| |common block
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25062
