------- Comment #20 from pluto at agmk dot net 2005-11-21 18:38 -------
(In reply to comment #19)
> (In reply to comment #18)
> > can we classify this as a code size regression?
>
> No because 3.3.x was also wrong in the sense it did not emit an emms.
ok.
gcc 4.1.0/20051113 with x87/mmx mode switch patch produces:
test: movq w, %mm0
paddw %mm0, %mm0
movq %mm0, w
movl w, %eax
movl w+4, %edx
movl %eax, dw
movl %edx, dw+4
emms
ret
.comm dw,8,8
.comm w,8,8
it isn't optimal but correct (emms opcode) and smaller than pure 4.1 output.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14552
