------- Comment #7 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-17 23:53 -------
What do you mean, "less or equal visibility to their enclosing scope?" My meta-goal is to try and give namespace and class scope visibilty attributes similar meanings. Do you think this is worthwhile, possible, and do you think this is a good idea? Yeah, maybe default namespace with hidden nested makes more sense for the examples. However, wouldn't both have to be supported, anyway? These kinds of "nonsensical" examples are possible with existing visibility attributes on classes. I'm just trying to keep the other scoping mechanism in mind (class scope) when thinking about how it applies to namespaces. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21764
