------- Comment #33 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-11-16 20:08 ------- Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] Bogus 'is used uninitialized...' warning about std::complex<T>
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Comment #32 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 19:58 > ------- > (In reply to comment #31) > >>This is not a valid argument. > > What would you consider a valid argument for an extension which is not that > well documented? We're not talking about the extension; we're talking about the warning. Your job is to explain why a user wants to see that warning on that code. Thankfully, RTH is going to eliminate the warning. You can file a bug about the "missing" warning, if you think it's important. You can also lobby for removing the extension, if you like -- but please don't do it in this PR. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23497
