------- Comment #4 from john at johnmaddock dot co dot uk 2005-11-12 18:32 ------- Doug's right: according to 3.4p4 passing an rvalue results in implementation defined behaviour. So you can support it or not as you wish. I'll update the Boost test case accordingly.
However... I predict that that I won't be the first to try and pass an rvalue through a call-wrapper :-) Regards, John. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24803
