------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 03:36 ------- For some reason we get the record B and not just I<T>::B which would be dependent.
Looking more into it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22136
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org Thu, 10 Nov 2005 19:36:17 -0800
------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 03:36 ------- For some reason we get the record B and not just I<T>::B which would be dependent.
Looking more into it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22136