------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-09 17:30 -------
This is invalid because otherwise you get the incorrect answer for &a[3]-&a[4]:
a = 0x8049668 b = 0x804966c
pointer ( a - b )
0xffffffff
non-pointer ( ( ((unsigned long)a) - ((unsigned long)b) ) / 4)
0x3fffffff
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24756
