------- Comment #2 from sraa at kse dot nl 2005-11-08 21:57 ------- Subject: RE: NaN or correct result after divrp with 3 FPU registers
Hello, That's the big problem. I'm trying for three weeks to get the problem expose itself in a small program. But I can't get it wrong on purpose. Otherwise I would have filled in a bug report 3 weeks ago. So it's a combination of the application with all it's use of memory and the instructions. It manifests regularly but not constant at our customer. It's a large application and communicating with PLC's. Even for me is hard to simulate the proces of the factory at our office. When I'm "lucky" I get the problem once a day. A lot of quesions: - Is there another way that someone with knowledge of gcc (development) can help me? Maybe someone in The Netherlands. - Or can you recommend someone at Sun? - Why isn't this version supported? - Is it better for me to build a new version of gcc myself? - When I build a new version on one system, is it possible to copy only the gcc executable to other systems, or do I need more, or even build again on all systems needing the new version (I don't expect this, but I ask to be sure). - When I send a .i or .s file of the source where it goes wrong, is there nothing you can say about it. I really have a very big problem since a few systems are waiting on a solution. Anyhow, thanks for the fast reply, and I hope that you can help me or answer my questions! Best regards, Stefan Raaijmakers. -----Original Message----- From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: dinsdag 8 november 2005 22:23 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Bug target/24743] NaN or correct result after divrp with 3 FPU registers ------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-08 21:23 ------- Do you have a small source code which exposes the issue here? (Note I saw "So I can not deliver a small program that reproduces the problem.... " but we really cannot do anything about it if there is not a testcase) Another thing is that you are using a GCC provided by Sun/Codesourcery and we (FSF) really don't support that version of GCC. You really should had filed a bug report to them first. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|c |target http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24743 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. ____________________________ Head Office: KSE Group Rondweg 27 NL-5531 AJ Bladel Phone: +31 (0)497 383818 Fax: +31 (0)497 383840 Visit our website at: www.kse.nl **************************************************************************** If you as intended recipient have received this e-mail incorrectly, please notify the sender (by e-mail) immediately. This e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. KSE Group does not guarantee that the information sent and/or received by or with this e-mail is correct and does not accept any liability for damages related thereto. KSE Group also does not accept any liability in case of the presence of viruses. **************************************************************************** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24743
