------- Comment #4 from law at redhat dot com 2005-11-08 17:47 ------- Just an interesting tidbit.
This testcase exposes a much more difficult/interesting long term problem. Namely, how should we handle uninitialized warnings for variables which are exposed by optimization. ie, in this case (and probably others), we have a local variable which has had its address taken, which normally suppresses uninitialized warnings. However, inlining followed by our SSA optimizers proves that we don't need the address of the local variable. That in turn exposes the local variable and we want to be able to warn about it if its uninitialized. Similar issues probably exist for SRA optimizations. Whee fun. jeff -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20968
