------- Comment #14 from thebohemian at gmx dot net 2005-11-08 10:15 ------- > But we don't need to use ffi_call here, we can just call the exception > throwing function directly. Right. That worked fine.
> Then you'll realize that these functions don't need to be separate at all. Yep. I made the trampoline function the error throwing function now. > Then you'll realize that you don't need to bother setting up > the ffi_cif - all you need is the exception argument. I doubt that this is right. The ffi_prep_closure() needs to know which arguments are given to it. AFAIK the caller can cast a ffi_closure pointer to any kind of function pointer (OK, except varargs). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24616
